New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Is fake meat good to eat? Processed plant-based meat alternatives linked to depression risk in vegetarians

Date:
December 17, 2024
Source:
University of Surrey
Summary:
Researchers found that vegetarians who consumed PBMAs had a 42% increased risk of depression compared to vegetarians who refrained from PBMAs.
Share:
FULL STORY

There is mounting evidence suggesting that ultra processed foods (UPF) are bad for our health; but if you stick to a vegetarian diet, is that still the case? Plant-Based Meat Alternatives (PBMA) are considered to be ultra-processed foods and may be associated with similar harms.

In the first study of its kind, published in Food Frontiers, researchers from the University of Surrey found that vegetarians who consumed PBMAs had a 42% increased risk of depression compared to vegetarians who refrained from PBMAs.

The study, which was led by Hana Navratilova, analysed data from the UK Biobank and found no notable differences in intake of sodium, free sugar, total sugar, or saturated fatty acids between those vegetarians who ate PBMAs and those who did not. The researchers did find, however, that those who eat PBMAs had higher blood pressure and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, a marker of inflammation, and lower levels of apolipoprotein A, a protein associated with HDL, a "good" cholesterol; PBMA consumption was, however, also linked to a reduced risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) by 40%.

Professor Nophar Geifman, from the School of Health Sciences at the University of Surrey, and senior author of the study, said:

"The overall findings are reassuring, suggesting that plant-based meat alternatives may be a safe option when they are part of an overall balanced diet. However, the potential link between these types of food, inflammation and depression warrants further investigation."

The study presented some limitations due to the data collected, which was predominantly from a white population in the UK, and dietary information only being gathered at the beginning of the study, not accounting for potential changes over time.

Professor Anthony Whetton, co-author of the study from the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Surrey, said:

"Ultra-processed plant-based meat alternatives can be a useful way for people to transition to a vegetarian diet effectively, and that helps with sustainable agricultural practices. Further research, including longitudinal studies and trials with more diverse populations, is necessary to confirm these findings and the relationship between vegetarian foods and mood."


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Surrey. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Hana F. Navratilova, Anthony D. Whetton, Nophar Geifman. Plant‐Based Meat Alternatives Intake and Its Association With Health Status Among Vegetarians of the UK Biobank Volunteer Population. Food Frontiers, 2024; DOI: 10.1002/fft2.532

Cite This Page:

University of Surrey. "Is fake meat good to eat? Processed plant-based meat alternatives linked to depression risk in vegetarians." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 17 December 2024. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/12/241217131336.htm>.
University of Surrey. (2024, December 17). Is fake meat good to eat? Processed plant-based meat alternatives linked to depression risk in vegetarians. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 18, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/12/241217131336.htm
University of Surrey. "Is fake meat good to eat? Processed plant-based meat alternatives linked to depression risk in vegetarians." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/12/241217131336.htm (accessed December 18, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES