New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Researchers develop smaller, lighter radiation shielding

Date:
February 12, 2020
Source:
North Carolina State University
Summary:
Researchers have developed a new technique for shielding electronics in military and space exploration technology from ionizing radiation. The new approach is more cost effective than existing techniques, and the secret ingredient is...rust.
Share:
FULL STORY

Researchers at North Carolina State University have developed a new technique for shielding electronics in military and space exploration technology from ionizing radiation. The new approach is more cost effective than existing techniques, and the secret ingredient is...rust.

"Our approach can be used to maintain the same level of radiation shielding and reduce the weight by 30% or more, or you could maintain the same weight and improve shielding by 30% or more -- compared to the most widely used shielding techniques," says Rob Hayes, co-author of a paper on the work and an associate professor of nuclear engineering at NC State. "Either way, our approach reduces the volume of space taken up by shielding."

Ionizing radiation can cause significant problems for electronic devices. To protect against this, devices that may be exposed to radiation -- such as devices used in spacecraft -- incorporate radiation shielding.

Weight is a significant factor in designing aerospace technologies, and the shielding most commonly found in aerospace devices consists of putting an aluminum box around any sensitive technologies. This has been viewed as providing the best tradeoff between a shield's weight and the protection it provides.

The new technique relies on mixing oxidized metal powder -- rust -- into a polymer, and then incorporating it into a common conformal coating on the relevant electronics.

"Metal oxide powder offers less shielding than metal powder would, but oxides are less toxic and don't pose electromagnetic challenges that could interfere with a device's operation," Hayes says.

"Radiation transport calculations show that inclusion of the metal oxide powder provides shielding comparable to a conventional shield," says Mike DeVanzo, a former graduate student at NC State and first author on the work. "At low energies, the metal oxide powder reduces both gamma radiation to the electronics by a factor of 300 and the neutron radiation damage by 225%."

"At the same time, the coating is less bulky than a shielding box," Hayes says. "And in computational simulations, the worst performance of the oxide coating still absorbed 30% more radiation than a conventional shield of the same weight.

"On top of that, the oxide particulate is much less expensive than the same amount of the pure metal," Hayes says.

"This could potentially reduce the need for conventional shielding materials on space-based electronics," adds DeVanzo, who works at Lockheed Martin Space.

The researchers are continuing to test and fine-tune their shielding technique for use in various applications.

"We're now looking for industry partners to help us develop the technology for commercial use," Hayes says.


Story Source:

Materials provided by North Carolina State University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Michael DeVanzo, Robert B. Hayes. Ionizing radiation shielding properties of metal oxide impregnated conformal coatings. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2020; 171: 108685 DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108685

Cite This Page:

North Carolina State University. "Researchers develop smaller, lighter radiation shielding." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 12 February 2020. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200212121957.htm>.
North Carolina State University. (2020, February 12). Researchers develop smaller, lighter radiation shielding. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 21, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200212121957.htm
North Carolina State University. "Researchers develop smaller, lighter radiation shielding." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200212121957.htm (accessed December 21, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES