New York State sepsis reporting mandate appears to improve care, reduce deaths

In "Mortality Changes Associated with Mandated Public Reporting for Sepsis: The Results of the New York State Initiative," Mitchell M. Levy, MD, and co-authors report that patients treated according to three- and six-hour sepsis "bundles" -- a group of interventions designed to diagnose and treat sepsis and septic shock early -- were 15 percent less likely to die than those whose care did not follow the protocols.

Patients who received the sepsis bundles also had shorter hospital stays. At hospitals with the highest rates of compliance with the three-hour bundle, length of stay was nearly three days shorter. At hospitals with the highest rates of compliance with the six-hour bundle, length of stay was more than a day shorter.

Sepsis occurs when the body reacts to an infection with an overwhelming inflammatory response. Severe sepsis can lead to the failure of one or more organs. Septic shock is a form of severe sepsis accompanied by extremely low blood pressure that is, in itself, life threatening.

The authors noted that the New York State mandate came about, in part, because of the tragic death in 2012 of an otherwise healthy 12-year-old boy named Rory Staunton from Queens, NY, who had undiagnosed sepsis. The case was widely reported in the New York and national media.

"Governor Andrew Cuomo and then Commissioner of Health Nirav Shah responded to Rory's preventable death by mandating public reporting of sepsis process and outcomes, with the goal of improving earlier diagnosis and management of sepsis," said Dr. Levy, professor of medicine and chief of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. "The reason the state adopted these particular bundles is that our group had published evidence that there was a strong association between compliance with these interventions and improved survival in sepsis."

In April 2014, New York State became the first state in the nation to require its hospitals to report to the Department of Health whether sepsis protocols had been followed in treating patients, along with specific patient outcomes. The researchers looked at the medical records of 91,357 patients (median age 71) with either condition who were hospitalized at 183 hospitals over the first 27 months of the new reporting mandate.

The researchers found that over the study period, the health care team increasingly initiated the sepsis bundles. Overall, the sepsis protocols were initiated in 81.3 percent of patients, most often in the emergency room. The risk-adjusted mortality of these patients was 24.4 percent, compared to 28.8 percent in those not receiving the bundles.

The NYS Department of Health gave hospitals flexibility in developing their sepsis protocols, but required that

• The three-hour bundle for all severe sepsis patients include drawing blood cultures before administering antibiotics and starting antibiotics and measuring blood lactate levels within three hours of arriving at the hospital.
• The six-hour bundle for those with septic shock (systolic pressure < 90 mm Hg or lactate level ? 4mmol/l) include administration of intravenous fluids (30 cc/kg), vasopressors and re-measurement of lactate within six hours of bundle initiation.

The authors noted that over the past three decades there has been a national movement towards public reporting of health care performance measures. The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other states have followed New York's lead in sepsis reporting.

Whether the overall trend towards this kind of reporting has improved health outcomes is a subject for debate, according to the authors. In the case of the sepsis requirement, they wrote that while their study cannot prove a causal relationship between implementation of the protocols and lower mortality, the evidence is nonetheless strong.

"The New York State sepsis initiative provides strong evidence that compliance with sepsis performance measures is associated with improved survival in these critically ill patients," Dr. Levy said. "At least in sepsis, our study strongly supports the value of public reporting of outcomes."