New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Organic/inorganic sulfur may be key for safe rechargeable lithium batteries

Date:
October 11, 2017
Source:
Penn State
Summary:
We have come a long way from leaky sulfur-acid automobile batteries, but modern lithium batteries still have some down sides. Now a team of engineers has a different type of lithium sulfur battery that could be more efficient, less expensive and safer.
Share:
FULL STORY

We have come a long way from leaky sulfur-acid automobile batteries, but modern lithium batteries still have some down sides. Now a team of Penn State engineers have a different type of lithium sulfur battery that could be more efficient, less expensive and safer.

"We demonstrated this method in a coin battery," said Donghai Wang, associate professor of mechanical engineering. "But, I think it could eventually become big enough for cell phones, drones and even bigger for electric vehicles."

Lithium sulfur batteries should be a promising candidate for the next generation of rechargeable batteries, but they are not without problems. For lithium, the efficiency in which charge transfers is low, and, lithium batteries tend to grow dendrites -- thin branching crystals -- when charging that do not disappear when discharged.

The researchers examined a self-formed, flexible hybrid solid-electrolyte interphase layer that is deposited by both organosulfides and organopolysulfides with inorganic lithium salts. The researchers report in today's (Oct. 11) issue of Nature Communications that the organic sulfur compounds act as plasticizers in the interphase layer and improve the mechanical flexibility and toughness of the layer. The interphase layer allows the lithium to deposit without growing dendrites. The Coulombic efficiency is about 99 percent over 400 recharging discharging cycles.

"We need some kind of barrier on the lithium in a lithium metal battery, or it reacts with everything," said Wang.

Sulfur is a good choice because it is inexpensive and provides the battery with high-charge capacity, higher-energy density so a lithium sulfur battery has more energy. However, a lithium sulfur battery forms an inorganic coating in the battery that is brittle and cannot tolerate changes in volume. The inorganic sulfur interface cannot sustain high energy. In a lithium sulfur battery, the electrolyte dries up and the bulk lithium corrodes. The lithium dendrites that form can create short circuits and other safety hazards.

"Potentially we can double the energy density of conventional DC batteries using lithium sulfur batteries with this hybrid organosulfide/organopolysulfide interface," said Wang.

They can also create a safer, more reliable battery.

To create their battery the researchers used an ether-based electrolyte with sulfur-containing polymer additives. The battery uses a sulfur infused carbon cathode and a lithium anode. The organic sulfur in the electrolyte self-forms the interphase layers.

The researchers report that they "demonstrate a lithium-sulfur battery exhibiting a long cycling life -- 1000 cycles -- and good capacity retention.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Penn State. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Guoxing Li, Yue Gao, Xin He, Qingquan Huang, Shuru Chen, Seong H. Kim, Donghai Wang. Organosulfide-plasticized solid-electrolyte interphase layer enables stable lithium metal anodes for long-cycle lithium-sulfur batteries. Nature Communications, 2017; 8 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00974-x

Cite This Page:

Penn State. "Organic/inorganic sulfur may be key for safe rechargeable lithium batteries." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 11 October 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171011120313.htm>.
Penn State. (2017, October 11). Organic/inorganic sulfur may be key for safe rechargeable lithium batteries. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 19, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171011120313.htm
Penn State. "Organic/inorganic sulfur may be key for safe rechargeable lithium batteries." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171011120313.htm (accessed April 19, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES