Adapted -- study shows that wild animals also get accustomed to humans
- Date:
- October 1, 2024
- Source:
- University of Potsdam
- Summary:
- Wild animals are less susceptible to human disturbance if they live in areas with a high human footprint. Researchers have highlighted this in their analysis of large-scale tracking data of more than 1,500 wild animals for an international research project. Individuals that are fitted with measuring devices such as GPS collars recover more quickly from the tagging event if they encounter humans or human tracks more frequently in their habitat. They seem to already be adapted to such disturbances
- Share:
Wild animals are less susceptible to human disturbance if they live in areas with a high human footprint. Potsdam researchers have highlighted this in their analysis of large-scale tracking data of more than 1,500 wild animals for an international research project. Individuals that are fitted with measuring devices such as GPS collars recover more quickly from the tagging event if they encounter humans or human tracks more frequently in their habitat. They seem to already be adapted to such disturbances.
The researchers noticed that the animals reacted differently in the first few days after being tagged, depending on whether they were herbivores, omnivores, or carnivores. Herbivores moved further and reacted with varying degrees of activity, while omnivores and carnivores were initially less active and mobile. The results of the analysis have now been published in the journal Nature Communications.
The tagging of wildlife provides important insights into their movements, physiology, and behavior amid globally changing ecosystems. However, the stress caused by capture, handling, and tagging can have an effect on the locomotion and activity of the animals and thus also affect the validity of the collected data. Therefore, Potsdam researchers led by Jonas Stiegler and Niels Blaum, in collaboration with over 100 other scientists worldwide, analyzed the data of 1585 individuals from 42 species that had been fitted with GPS collars. "Over a period of 20 days after release, we analyzed how active the animals were and what distances they covered in order to see how much the animals deviated from their normal behavior and how long it took them to recover from the disturbance," explains Jonas Stiegler, the lead author of the study.
30 of the 42 species studied changed their behavior significantly in the first few days after release, although there were noticeable differences between the species. For example, predators covered shorter distances on average after release, while most herbivores covered longer distances than normal. Moose (63 % further than the long-term average) and eland (+ 52 %) had the largest increase in displacement distance, while leopards (- 65 %) and wolves (- 44 %) exhibited the largest decrease. In general, omnivores and carnivores were less active in the first few days, while herbivores showed both increased and decreased activity rates. However, the data also revealed that the animals "recovered" at different rates: All species basically returned to their normal behavior within four to seven days. Omnivores and carnivores went back to a normal degree of activity and movement within five to six days, herbivores exhibited a normal range of movement more quickly (four to five days), but only returned to their usual degree of activity at a later stage (six to eight days). In addition, larger animals recovered more quickly than smaller ones.
"However, it was particularly noteworthy that animals whose habitat is more strongly influenced by humans were the first to return to normal behavior," Jonas Stiegler said. "Our evaluation clearly shows that the periods over which wild animals are tracked should be longer than one week in order to obtain meaningful results and to actually be able to study their natural behavior."
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of Potsdam. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
- Jonas Stiegler, Cara A. Gallagher, Robert Hering, Thomas Müller, Marlee Tucker, Marco Apollonio, Janosch Arnold, Nancy A. Barker, Leon Barthel, Bruno Bassano, Floris M. van Beest, Jerrold L. Belant, Anne Berger, Dean E. Beyer Jr, Laura R. Bidner, Stephen Blake, Konstantin Börner, Francesca Brivio, Rudy Brogi, Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar, Francesca Cagnacci, Jasja Dekker, Jane Dentinger, Martin Duľa, Jarred F. Duquette, Jana A. Eccard, Meaghan N. Evans, Adam W. Ferguson, Claudia Fichtel, Adam T. Ford, Nicholas L. Fowler, Benedikt Gehr, Wayne M. Getz, Jacob R. Goheen, Benoit Goossens, Stefano Grignolio, Lars Haugaard, Morgan Hauptfleisch, Morten Heim, Marco Heurich, Mark A. J. Hewison, Lynne A. Isbell, René Janssen, Anders Jarnemo, Florian Jeltsch, Jezek Miloš, Petra Kaczensky, Tomasz Kamiński, Peter Kappeler, Katharina Kasper, Todd M. Kautz, Sophia Kimmig, Petter Kjellander, Rafał Kowalczyk, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Max Kröschel, Anette Krop-Benesch, Peter Linderoth, Christoph Lobas, Peter Lokeny, Mia-Lana Lührs, Stephanie S. Matsushima, Molly M. McDonough, Jörg Melzheimer, Nicolas Morellet, Dedan K. Ngatia, Leopold Obermair, Kirk A. Olson, Kidan C. Patanant, John C. Payne, Tyler R. Petroelje, Manuel Pina, Josep Piqué, Joseph Premier, Jan Pufelski, Lennart Pyritz, Maurizio Ramanzin, Manuel Roeleke, Christer M. Rolandsen, Sonia Saïd, Robin Sandfort, Krzysztof Schmidt, Niels M. Schmidt, Carolin Scholz, Nadine Schubert, Nuria Selva, Agnieszka Sergiel, Laurel E. K. Serieys, Václav Silovský, Rob Slotow, Leif Sönnichsen, Erling J. Solberg, Mikkel Stelvig, Garrett M. Street, Peter Sunde, Nathan J. Svoboda, Maria Thaker, Maxi Tomowski, Wiebke Ullmann, Abi T. Vanak, Bettina Wachter, Stephen L. Webb, Christopher C. Wilmers, Filip Zieba, Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica, Niels Blaum. Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes. Nature Communications, 2024; 15 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52381-8
Cite This Page: