How animal swarms respond to threats

A microrobotic swarm

The starting point for the researchers' work was to consider a group of peacefully swirling animals and what would happen if it suddenly encountered a dangerous situation.

For their experiments, the researchers used a system of microrobots, which are comprised of glass balls that are programmable, active, and spread out finely within a certain area. When the beads are lit using a focused laser beam, one side of them warms up and causes them to move, like animals. "We are able to target each individual bead and adjust its movement to fit that of its neighbours," explains Chen, who is completing his doctorate in Bechinger's research team and who was mainly responsible for completing the experiments. "The robots in our swarm are programmed to avoid collisions. They also received the information that they were to orient their motion based on the location of the approximate middle of the group. With the help of these rules, the robots organized themselves into a swirl," and Bechinger adds: "The microrobotic swarm reproduces the movements of real animal swarms surprisingly well."

The flight behaviour of microrobots

As soon as a predator appears, the microrobots change their movements, Bechinger says. However, the change in direction is only minimal and does not cause each member of the swarm to move directly away from the predator at any given time. It is striking, however, that the group as a whole moves in a straight line away from the predator. "This feat in which individuals move in a way that is not ideal for each one of them, but where the group as a whole behaves optimally, is based on a collective decision-making process or "swarm intelligence" where information is constantly being exchanged between different members of a group," Bechinger states.

"One direct consequence of this behaviour is that the efficiency of the flight response remains virtually unchanged, even if half of the microrobots -- or animals -- do not respond to the threat," Chen explains. "This shows that missing or incomplete information from individual members of a group can be compensated by other members." The physicists think this could possibly be one of the reasons why animals organize themselves in herds, even though herds are significantly easier for predators to spot than individual animals.

Animal behaviour relevant for other applications

In addition to gaining a better understanding of the basis for decision-making in groups of animals, the research results are also relevant for applications in the field of microrobotics. At the moment, different scenarios are being discussed in which multiple autonomous robots complete a useful task together and in which disruptions to communication between the robots would automatically cause problems. With the knowledge gained from this study, a robotic swarm could work well even if, for example, the sensors in individual robots were to fail. Bechinger adds: "The other microrobots would simply compensate for those with broken sensors, giving such systems a very high level of robustness."

Video on the microrobotic simulation of the animal flight response: https://youtu.be/01Fcau5wxII

Author background and funding

• Professor Clemens Bechinger is a member of the Cluster of Excellence "Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour" at the University of Konstanz. He is also a professor in the Department of Physics.
• Chun-Jen Chen is completing his doctorate in the "Colloidal Systems" research team led by Bechinger.
• Project funding: Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour