How a macaque's brain knows it's swinging
- Date:
- April 21, 2016
- Source:
- Cell Press
- Summary:
- Any organism with a brain needs to make decisions about how it's going to navigate through three-dimensional spaces. That's why animals evolved sensory organs in the ears to detect if they're rotating or moving in a straight line. But how does an animal perceive curved motion, as in turning a corner? One explanation is that curved motion is detected when sensory neurons in the brain receiving converging information about linear and rotational movement are activated.
- Share:
Any organism with a brain needs to make decisions about how it's going to navigate through three-dimensional spaces. That's why animals have evolved sensory organs in the ears to detect if they're rotating or moving in a straight line. But how does an animal perceive curved motion, as in turning a corner? One explanation, published April 21 in Cell Reports, from researchers looking at macaques, is that curved motion is detected when sensory neurons in the brain receiving converging information about linear and rotational movement are activated.
The parts of the ear that help macaques and humans detect motion are the same ones that help us stay balanced. Otoliths are sphere-like organs that detect linear motion and gravitational pull. In contrast, semi-circular canals specifically detect rotational movement. Information about an animal's motion collected by these organs are then sent to the central nervous system in the brain
It's known that two distinct sets of neurons help us sense linear and rotational movement, but the new study identified a third set of neurons in the macaque sensory cortex that respond optimally to curved motion.
"It's a very interesting question as to why our brain evolved this way," says corresponding author Yong Gu, a neuroscientist at the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences and Chinese Academy of Sciences. "We don't have to have these curved motion neurons in the sensory area of the brain; the information about translation and rotation could have converged at a higher level, e.g. association cortex which is important for sensory-motor transformation and decision making. Our hunch is that representation of curved motion in sensory cortex helps animals rapidly detect this type of movement, and save the working load of the decision centres for other important neural computations."
Gu and lab member Zhixian Cheng made their discovery by placing macaques in moving platforms and attaching brain electrodes to individual neurons to measure how often and when they fired. "People have known that linear and rotational motion converged in the sensory cortex, and we found that certain neurons fire more spikes when the linear or rotational information are available at the same time for these neurons," Gu says. "This might have been expected, but we now propose that these neurons could represent curvilinear motion."
The experiments also mimicked a 1997 human study in which subjects were passively moved in various motion conditions (e.g, curvilinear motion versus moving in a straight line while rotating the body) and reported analogous curved-motion sensation as long as both linear and rotation signals are present simultaneously. The current macaque neurophysiological data show extremely similar patterns, thus could account for the human psychophysical data. "This is surprising," Gu says. "In nature, we should be able to tell these two different types of motion during active navigation. Other signals in the brain, for example, the motor command signals may help."
The past decade has seen a surge in papers on how the body senses motion, and Gu believes there are more surprises to come. In particular, he's interested in learning how other sensory systems play a role in how primates know where they are going.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Cell Press. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
- Cheng and Gu. Distributed representation of curvilinear self-motion in macaque parietal cortex. Cell Reports, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.089
Cite This Page: