TB vaccine shrinks liver cancer tumors in mice

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer. It is also the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Current therapies include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and liver transplant. Yet, the therapy outcomes for liver cancer remain bleak.

BCG, the century-old TB vaccine, is derived from the live bacteria Mycobacterium bovis. It is considered safe and widely used around the world.

BCG is also known to boost the body's immunity. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved it for the treatment of bladder cancer. Yet, the potential effect of BCG in treating solid tumors, such as those of liver cancer, remained unknown.

The new study, led by Distinguished Professor Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan, showed that one dose of BCG delivered under the skin reduced tissue scarring (fibrosis), improved liver function, lowered liver lipid, and led to tumor shrinkage.

"HCC is very difficult to treat. This cancer is considered a cold tumor, which does not respond well to immunotherapy," said Wan, the study's senior author and vice chair for research in the UC Davis Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. "We had a good reason to believe that the BCG vaccine could stimulate an immune response. So, we gave a dose of BCG to mice with liver cancer, and to our surprise, it was enough to activate the body's immune system and reduce tumor load."

How does the TB vaccine fight liver cancer?

The researchers gave a BCG dose under the skin to mice with liver cancer. This is the same way the BCG vaccine is given to humans. They found that BCG reduced inflammation and promoted the work of immune T cells. It specifically allowed the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages into the tumor.

"We discovered that the BCG treatment resulted in the movement of T cells and macrophages to the tumor. It also activated the body's immunity and enhanced IFN-γ signaling, which contributes to an anti-HCC effect," Wan said.

Macrophages are white blood cells that can fight cancer. BCG induced IFN-γ signaling, resulting in cancer cell death.

The study also tested if the effects of BCG on liver cancer are sex dependent.

"While previous studies have shown sex differences in BCG effects on immunity, our data showed that both male and female HCC mice responded to the BCG treatment," Wan added.

A better immunotherapy for liver cancer

Bacterial immunotherapy, such as BCG, offers an alternative to current immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors. It has the potential to revolutionize the treatment approach for HCC.

"Our study showed that BCG immunotherapy for HCC is different from and superior to other immunotherapies. It requires only a single injection. In animal models, BCG generated better anti-liver cancer treatment outcomes than other standard immunotherapies, such as anti-PD-1. This means a potentially more simplified treatment plan," Wan explained.

Future directions

The study findings suggest that the BCG vaccine could be repurposed as an HCC treatment. The discovery is significant, since BCG is already used safely around the world.

The researchers point to the need to explore the potential preventive ability of BCG and whether multiple doses would be even more effective at combating liver cancer. The efficacy could also be boosted through dosage adjustments, different timing and number of doses.

"If BCG treated a tough tumor like liver cancer, I'm optimistic it can work well on other hard-to-treat cancers. We would need more research in order to move to the next step. For example, we don't know how long this immune memory lasts, so efficacy of this vaccine over time is still a mystery. The mechanism can be complicated, and further research is needed," Wan explained.

The team also recommended examining the impact of BCG on the gut microbiome via the gut-liver axis.

The co-first authors on this study are Farzam Vaziri and Tahereh Setayesh. The other co-authors are Ying Hu, Resmi Ravindran and Dongguang Wei. This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01CA222490, R50CA243787 and T32 CA108459-15.