Immediate carbon cuts, common marine heatwave terminology urged

Carbon dioxide removal is not the golden ticket

In all the scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, nations around the world must dramatically and rapidly reduce their dependence on fossil fuels in order to limit global warming to 1.5-2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Further, the paths to limit warming also require the removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, using methods that are still in the early stages of development.

However, David Ho, oceanography professor at the UH Manoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), wrote in his recent Nature article, "We must stop talking about deploying [carbon dioxide removal] as a solution today, when emissions remain high -- as if it somehow replaces radical, immediate emission cuts. We have to shift the narrative as a matter of urgency."

This is critical, he points out, over the next few years, as pressure mounts to develop technology-based climate solutions. Instead, Ho advocates for rapid decarbonization of global energy systems, especially since the effectiveness of carbon dioxide removal depends on emissions being low.

"Humanity has never removed an atmospheric pollutant at a global, continental or, even, regional scale -- we have only ever shut down the source and let nature do the clearing up," he wrote, in a warning about not relying on carbon dioxide removal in case it does not work. "We must slow the carbon clock to a crawl before we can turn it back."

Clarifying marine heatwaves

In the same issue of Nature, Malte Stuecker and Brian Powell, professors in the SOEST Department of Oceanography, and their co-authors, all members of the U.S. NOAA Marine Ecosystem Task Force, identified the need for clearer definitions of marine heatwaves so coastal communities could adapt to these events and resource managers can better prioritize mitigation strategies.

"Clearly communicating baselines for assessing ocean warming is essential for understanding extreme events and how they will affect marine ecosystems and livelihoods in the future," the co-authors wrote.

The researchers highlight that the term 'marine heatwave' is currently being used to refer to two different phenomena -- short lasting extreme events and long-term warming trends. They note that the communication breakdown is "having real-world consequences" and worry that "the public might become desensitized to the real threat of marine heatwaves."

When it comes to changes in surface ocean temperature, the authors recommend using the phrase 'long-term temperature trends' to describe the relatively slow changes in ocean temperature that occur over decades or longer -- primarily due to anthropogenic greenhouse gasses increasing.

In contrast, they recommend only using the term 'marine heatwave' to describe ocean temperature changes that are transient and extremely warm relative to the expected conditions for a given place and time, as defined by an evolving, recent climatological reference period.

Finally, use of the term 'total heat exposure' is recommended to describe the combination of long-term warming and marine heatwaves.

The paper notes, "by adopting our suggested ocean temperature communication framework, scientists will be able to better equip marine resource decision makers to assess and prepare for risks associated with different types of ocean temperature change."

These publications highlight the complexities and also the need for accuracy and data-driven decision-making as community members, resource managers, innovators, politicians and investors all come to the table to ensure a more stable climate path for future generations.