Scientists identify key biomarkers that reliably predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma

In a paper published in Nature Communications, Noam Auslander, Ph.D., assistant professor in the Molecular & Cellular Oncogenesis Program of Wistar's Ellen and Ronald Caplan Cancer Center, and Andrew Patterson, graduate student in the Auslander lab, identify novel predictors of ICI therapy for melanoma. In particular, mutations in the processes of leukocyte and T-cell proliferation regulation show potential as biomarkers with reliable and stable prediction of ICI therapy response across multiple different datasets of melanoma patients.

"This work aims to identify better and more biologically interpretable genomic predictors for immunotherapy responses," notes Auslander. "We need better biomarkers to help select patients that are more likely to respond to ICI therapy and understand what factors can help to enhance responses and increase those numbers."

Using machine learning and publicly available de-identified clinical data, researchers investigated why some melanoma patients responded to ICI therapy and others did not. Patterson, first author on the paper, details that their research process involved training machine learning models on a dataset to predict whether a patient responds to ICI therapy, and then confirming that the model was able to continually predict response or resistance to this treatment over multiple other datasets.

The team found that leukocyte and T-cell proliferation regulation processes have some mutated genes that contribute to ICI treatment response and resistance. This knowledge could be used to identify targets to enhance responses or mitigate resistance in patients with melanoma.

"We were able to better predict if a patient would respond to ICI therapy than the current clinical standard method as well as extract biological information that could help in further understanding the mechanisms behind ICI therapy response and resistance." Patterson explains.

The scientists intend to continue this work with the goals of increasing prediction accuracy, further understanding biological mechanisms underpinning patient resistance or responsiveness to ICI therapy, and determining whether the processes distinguished in the paper can also serve as predictors of ICI treatment response for other cancer types.