Understanding light-activated proteins in order to improve them

Properties of natural proteins not optimal for optogenetics

"The introduction of light-sensitive proteins into organisms for the targeted control of certain functions from the outside offers enormous potential for neuroscientific research and its therapeutic application," says Klaus Gerwert. "Unfortunately, the properties of these naturally occurring proteins, for example in green algae, are not always optimal for the relevant optogenetic application."

For this reason, the properties of the proteins have to be adapted by changing their gene sequences. Currently, this is done based on trial and error. "In order to specifically optimise the proteins for their potential applications, a deep understanding of molecular reactions and the resulting ion conduction is necessary," points out Klaus Gerwert. "We obtain the necessary structural dynamic understanding of protein mechanisms with high spatial and temporal resolution by combining time-resolved Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and biomolecular simulations," explains PRODI researcher Dr. Till Rudack.

Molecular mechanisms determine efficiency

Using these methods, Klaus Gerwert and his team recently discovered the mechanism that causes the channelrhodopsin 2 protein, which is widely used in optogenetics, to lose its efficiency over time. Previously, researchers had assumed that light excitation stimulated a specific structural change in the protein. However, the group found that light exposure induces two different structural changes: One is the desired channel opening, which is useful for optogenetics. The second provides only a weak ion current, but gains the upper hand with longer exposure and suppresses the channel opening -- a drawback for optogenetics.

In the current study, the researchers used time-resolved Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and biomolecular simulations to explore a different channel rhodopsin, called anion-channelrhodopsin-1. "This channel hardly has any loss of efficiency following prolonged exposure and also doesn't have a second parallel pathway of structural change," explains Dr. Max-Aylmer Dreier, first author of the study.

"We have thus proven that splitting into two parallel pathways leads to inefficient channels. In efficient channels there doesn't seem to be a second parallel pathway," concludes Klaus Gerwert. "In the future, we will use the insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of channel efficiency to block the inefficient second pathway by targeted protein design and thus design improved optogenetic tools," predicts Till Rudack.