Interactions between simple molecular mechanisms give rise to complex infection dynamics

Some infections can bring new genes to bacteria

Many viruses simply replicate inside bacteria and such infections, which usually result in the death of the infected bacterium, are called lytic. However, some viruses, called temperate viruses, can take a gentler approach: During lysogenic infections, the genetic information of a temperate virus integrates into the genetic information of the infected bacterium and thus enhances the bacterial gene repertoire. Examples of genes, which are spread among bacteria by temperate viruses, include dangerous toxins, such as shiga toxin, cholera toxin, or botulinum toxin. However, there is a catch for the bacteria as temperate viruses can both kill or integrate into their hosts, and the decision on which way the infection will proceed is made in a seemingly random manner.

It is well known that many bacteria protect themselves from lethal lytic infections by carrying mechanisms of immunity, such as Restriction-Modification (RM) systems that cut viral DNA. What is not known is how these primitive immune systems affect the ability of bacteria to acquire potentially beneficial viruses in the process of lysogeny. Can RM systems distinguish between lytic and lysogenic infections, or do they act more generally and, in protecting bacteria from death, also prevent them from acquisition of beneficial viruses? Pleska, Lang and their colleagues combined experiments and theory to investigate this question.

Individual vs population -- a counterintuitive finding

As a first step, the researchers looked at what happens to individual bacteria carrying RM systems when infected with temperate viruses. They found that the RM system always sought to prevent infection, regardless of whether the infection was heading towards lysis or lysogeny. From this, the conclusion would be that, as an inadvertent cost of preventing bacteria from lysis, RM system are also a barrier to acquisition of viral genes.

However, a very different result emerged when the researchers investigated what happens at the level of the bacterial population. Simply speaking, they mixed a large number of bacteria with a large number of bacteriophages, and looked at how many bacteria acquired viral genes in the long-term. Based on the previous result, the scientists expected that viruses will integrate much less often in bacteria with RM systems, as compared to bacteria without this mechanism of immunity. However, the opposite happened: more viruses had integrated into bacteria that were expected to be immune.

Restriction-modification systems offer temporary respite

What is the explanation of this counterintuitive result? The researchers found that instead of preventing infections completely, RM systems merely postpone the infection, giving the bacterial population time to grow until viruses break through the barrier and infection fully hits. While lysis is more frequent in small bacterial populations and many bacteria get killed if the population is infected early on, lysogeny becomes more prevalent in large bacterial populations, making bacteria that get infected later more likely to acquire the virus instead of getting killed by it. RM systems therefore offer a temporary respite, protecting bacterial populations only from the most dangerous phase of infection, without limiting the potential benefits.

The importance of population-level interactions

Is a new unknown molecular mechanism responsible for this switch in behaviour? No, says first author Maros Pleska: "The most intriguing finding is that we actually did not have to find any new mechanism at all. What we observe is all a simple consequence of the population dynamics of interactions between bacteria and viruses." This result is a rebuff to those seeking to predict the longer-term behaviour of populations from the biology of individual molecular components, explains Pleska: "The basic biology of all the elements in our system was known as the RM systems and viruses we looked at are some of the best understood molecular systems we know. Nevertheless, this study illustrates how hopeless we are when it comes to using this molecular-level knowledge to predict the dynamics that occur after we put individual pieces together. In fact, our observations ran completely opposite to what anyone would expect. Thus, ecological and evolutionary interactions between even the simplest biological elements can be very complex and we need new ways of looking at them, if we ever want to understand their role in nature."