New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Vaccine rejection and hesitancy examined: Effect of calls to promote vaccination

Date:
July 19, 2017
Source:
Kent State University
Summary:
The center of a public health debate is whether parents should have their children vaccinated. Researchers challenge statements made by influential individuals who oppose the widespread use of vaccines.
Share:
FULL STORY

The center of a public health debate is whether parents should have their children vaccinated. Tara Smith, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology at Kent State University's College of Public Health, challenges statements made by influential individuals who oppose the widespread use of vaccines, and she calls upon her colleagues in the scientific community to speak out to promote vaccination.

The article, "Vaccine Rejection and Hesitancy: A Review and Call to Action," is published by Oxford Press' Open Forum Infectious Diseases. In the July 18 article, Smith presents clear and scientifically based arguments to explain why anti-vaccination statements are inaccurate, misleading and even disingenuous. As a recognized expert in microbiology of infectious disease, her concern is that the public can become confused about the safety of vaccines and may be hesitant to immunize themselves and their children.

Widespread refusal of vaccines could lead to many more people becoming infected with vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, mumps and influenza.

"Though there is scant evidence that refusal is genuinely increasing in the population, multiple studies have demonstrated concerning patterns of decline of confidence in vaccines, the medical professionals who administer vaccines and the scientists who study and develop vaccines," Smith wrote.

Her article presents reliable information about vaccine safety while debunking myths that are being circulated and creating misunderstandings among the general public. The article also presents ways that healthcare and infectious disease professionals can actively promote vaccination to friends, family and the people they serve. This information is presented in a way that is sensitive to scientifically trained professionals' reluctance to advocate on issues in black-and-white terms while also recognizing what is at stake if they do not take action.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Kent State University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Tara C. Smith. Vaccine rejection and hesitancy: a review and call to action. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2017; DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx146

Cite This Page:

Kent State University. "Vaccine rejection and hesitancy examined: Effect of calls to promote vaccination." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 19 July 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170719132238.htm>.
Kent State University. (2017, July 19). Vaccine rejection and hesitancy examined: Effect of calls to promote vaccination. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 3, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170719132238.htm
Kent State University. "Vaccine rejection and hesitancy examined: Effect of calls to promote vaccination." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170719132238.htm (accessed December 3, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES