New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Satellite data reveal serious decline in Georgia salt marsh health

Date:
July 29, 2016
Source:
University of Georgia
Summary:
The amount of vegetation along the Georgia coast has declined significantly in the last 30 years, spurring concerns about the overall health of marshland ecosystems in the area, warn scientists.
Share:
FULL STORY

Scientists at the University of Georgia's Marine Institute at Sapelo Island have found that the amount of vegetation along the Georgia coast has declined significantly in the last 30 years, spurring concerns about the overall health of marshland ecosystems in the area.

Using data collected by NASA's Landsat TM 5 satellite, which provided 28 years of nearly continuous images of Earth's surface between 1984 and 2011, the researchers found that the amount of marsh plant biomass had dropped 35 percent. They published their findings recently in the journal Remote Sensing.

This sharp decline is largely due to changes in climate, the researchers report, with prolonged periods of drought and increased temperatures playing a major role. And scientists worry that this loss of vegetation will have a ripple effect throughout the complex marsh-based ecosystems.

"A decrease in the growth of marsh plants likely affects all of the animals that depend on the marsh, such as juvenile shrimp and crabs, which use the marsh as a nursery," said Merryl Alber, director of the Marine Institute and UGA professor of marine sciences. "These decreases in vegetation may also affect other marsh services, such as stabilizing the shoreline, filtering pollutants and protecting against storm damage."

The research was conducted by John Schalles, professor of biology at Creighton University in Nebraska and adjunct professor of marine science at UGA, and John O'Donnell, a graduate student in Creighton's department of atmospheric sciences.

The scientists used satellite imagery to observe the growth of Spartina alternifolora -- more commonly known as cordgrass -- which is the dominant plant in most salt marshes along the U.S. East Coast. Because cordgrass is so abundant, scientists can use it as an indicator of the wetland's overall health.

The use of satellites allowed Schalles and O'Donnell to observe large swaths of cordgrass marshland without enduring the hardships and expense of extensive field work.

"Salt marshes are muddy environments that are difficult to navigate, and you have to carefully plan your expeditions for low tide," said O'Donnell, who spent a year in residence at the UGA Marine Institute while conducting his research. "The use of the satellite allowed us to get data from a much larger area than what could be collected in the field. It also allowed us to go back in time."

Ultimately, both Schalles and O'Donnell hope that their satellite-based study of marshland will continue on Sapelo Island, as well as in other coastal regions throughout the world.

"We plan to extend this work over the coming years and use it to help predict how marshes will respond to sea level rise and other long-term change," Schalles said.


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Georgia. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. John O’Donnell, John Schalles. Examination of Abiotic Drivers and Their Influence on Spartina alterniflora Biomass over a Twenty-Eight Year Period Using Landsat 5 TM Satellite Imagery of the Central Georgia Coast. Remote Sensing, 2016; 8 (6): 477 DOI: 10.3390/rs8060477

Cite This Page:

University of Georgia. "Satellite data reveal serious decline in Georgia salt marsh health." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 29 July 2016. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160729111306.htm>.
University of Georgia. (2016, July 29). Satellite data reveal serious decline in Georgia salt marsh health. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 21, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160729111306.htm
University of Georgia. "Satellite data reveal serious decline in Georgia salt marsh health." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160729111306.htm (accessed December 21, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES