Sexism and poorer parenting: Study suggests a link

The study was the first of its type.

"For decades, sexism has been known to predict negative behaviours toward women, from discrimination to violence," says lead author Professor Nickola Overall, of Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland. "Our study suggests the effects flow through to poorer parenting."

Video-recording family groups in the laboratory, researchers assessed parents' responsiveness, including warmth, involvement, engagement, and sensitivity toward their children.

The less responsive parents -- both mothers and fathers -- had disclosed higher levels of "hostile sexism," an academic term for attitudes favouring male authority and antagonism toward women who challenge men's social power.

The results for fathers were expected and highlight that the harmful effects of men's sexist attitudes may also involve poorer parenting, says Overall.

The discovery that mothers who agree with hostile sexism were likely to be less responsive parents was unexpected. "It could be that these mothers follow the father's lead in family interactions, which leads to less engaged parenting," she says. "Another possibility is that mothers guard their traditional role as caregiver by restricting the father's parental involvement, which detracts from being responsive to the children."

Responsive parenting is pivotal to healthy child development, and its absence can lead to behavioural issues, emotional difficulties, and lower academic achievement.

There's no proof of causality in the University of Auckland research and alternative causes can't be ruled out. In addition, the laboratory setting will have altered participants behaviour, cutting for example the likelihood of displays of the most punitive parenting.

"Despite these caveats, the current studies emphasize the importance of understanding how, why, and when sexist attitudes affect parenting -- a pivotal and overlooked domain that is intricately connected to the power-differentiated gender roles that reinforce gender inequality," Overall and her co-authors wrote in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.

"The novel results offer new directions in understanding the broader impact of sexist attitudes on children across generations," says Overall. "There is also more to understand about why women continue to agree with sexist attitudes despite the harm they have for women and children."

The link with less responsive parenting didn't exist for mothers and fathers classed as disclosing "benevolent sexism," a term for attitudes romanticizing traditional gender roles by emphasizing the virtues of men as providers and protectors and women as caregivers, Overall says.

The first part of the research featured 95 mixed-gender couples with their five-year-old children. Observing families undertaking a collaborative task of building a cardboard tower, the researchers uncovered the statistical association between hostile sexism and less responsive parenting. A second study of 281 couples and their children observed in two different family tasks replicated the link.

To establish levels of sexism, parents had answered questions such as:

• Most women fail to appreciate fully all that men do for them
• Women seek to gain power by getting control over men
• Women exaggerate problems they have at work
• Once a woman gets a man to commit to her she usually tries to put him on a tight leash
• Women are too easily offended

Both men and women can hold these beliefs and some women agree strongly with them

Across 19 countries, nations such as Chile and South Africa were ranked high for "hostile sexism" while the likes Australia and the Netherlands were ranked lower, according to research published in 2000, which did not include New Zealand.

"Improving child health and wellbeing is connected to improving the attitudes that confine women and men to specific roles, and vice versa," says Overall.

The study co-authors were Dr Valerie Chang, Dr Annette Henderson and Dr Caitlin McRae, all from the University of Auckland, Dr Emily Cross of the University of Essex, and Dr Rachel Low of Victoria University of Wellington.