Whales not to be counted on as 'climate savers'

Despite some hope that this would be the case, a new study led by Griffith University and a team of global researchers has found the amount of potential carbon capture by whales is too little to meaningfully alter the course of climate change.

Marine scientist Dr Olaf Meynecke and the team from the Griffith-led Whales and Climate Research Program including Professor Brendan Mackey and Dr Jasper De Bie, reviewed the primary ways in which baleen whales (such as humpback whales) removed atmospheric carbon at regional and global scales.

The team found the amount potentially sequestered by the whales was too minimal to make significant impact on the trajectory of climate change.

"Our study support that whales are important for the marine ecosystem, but their contribution to the global carbon flux is too small to effectively reduce atmospheric carbon," Dr Meynecke said.

"While our research group would very much like to highlight the opposite in order to benefit the conservation of whales and perhaps one day use carbon credits to support research, the debate is misguiding and creates false hope.

"This is in contrast to media perpetuating whales as climate engineers.

"Creating false hope in the ability of charismatic species to be climate engineers may act to further delay the urgent behavioural change needed to avert catastrophic climate change impacts, which can in turn have indirect consequences for the recovery of whale populations."

The ocean carbon cycle is a major driver of the world's climate and further investigation on existing gaps in whale ecology will help clarify their contribution to it, stressed the team.

There are other potential pathways in which whales can contribute to carbon capture: through their biomass in which carbon is kept for decades (depending on their life span); and when a whale dies by falling to the ocean floor where it may eventually be covered by sediment.

And while whales were vital to the healthy functioning of marine ecosystems, Dr Meynecke said overstating their ability to prevent or counterbalance human-induced changes in global carbon budgets may unintentionally redirect attention from well-established methods of reducing greenhouse gases.

"Previous estimations neglect the scale in which carbon sequestration occurred both temporally and spatially. Some of the pathways suggested for carbon sequestration such as whale falls (when whales die and sink to the ocean floor but retain carbon for decades) also underestimate the breathing of whales.

"We think it is important to acknowledge that there are other values of whales that are more relevant to drive their conservation than carbon capture.

"Large scale protection of marine environments including the habitats of whales will build resilience and assist with natural carbon capture at a global scale."

The research 'Do whales really increase the oceanic removal of atmospheric carbon?' has been published in Frontiers in Marine Science, Marine Megafauna.

This research was assisted by funding to the Whales and Climate Research Program.