US' power supply has capacity to adapt to climate change

A new paper written by City University of New York (CUNY) scientists -- "Climate and Water Resource Change Impacts and Adaptation Potential for U.S. Power Supply," published in Nature Climate Change -- has found that climate change ultimately will have a negative effect on the reliability of electricity generation in the United States, but today's infrastructure may be more adaptable to future climate conditions than previously thought.

Improvements in resiliency are largely the result of efforts driven by policy and economic opportunities that are making U.S. power supply cleaner and more efficient, said scientists with the Advanced Science Research Center (ASRC) at the Graduate Center, CUNY. Modern power plants use fewer natural resources, such as water, to produce electricity, making them more adaptable to warmer, drier conditions than older plants. And they are better able to maintain power supply reserves during peak demands. While some regions appear susceptible to climate-change-related constraints on electricity production, an excess of reserves in other less-affected regions can aid those with diminished reserves, said Ariel Miara, ASRC research associate and lead author of the paper.

"Almost all power plants will be affected by climate change, but we don't require all plants to operate at full capacity 24/7," said Miara, also a PhD Candidate at The City College of New York's Grove School of Engineering. "Lower available capacity due to climate impacts at some plants may be insignificant because the collective available capacity remains sufficient for meeting electricity needs."

Miara and other ASRC scientists worked with researchers from National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories to conduct the study. The team analyzed 1,080 thermoelectric plants across the contiguous United States under future climate conditions and evaluated both their individual and collective performance across 19 North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) sub-regions. Previous studies projecting power supply capacity only considered individual plant capabilities.

"This study demonstrates how the traditional approach of studying individual power stations fails to assess our true level of vulnerability," said Charles J. Vörösmarty, director of the Environmental Sciences Initiative at the ASRC and a contributing author. "A regional system-wide viewpoint is needed because it allows us to see all sorts of factors and synergies that cannot be articulated by focusing on individual plant behaviors. Our findings about the full system offer a promising result among the otherwise daunting challenges of climate change -- that if you search in the correct manner, you can find opportunities to adapt to change."

Although the study's findings are encouraging, the paper's authors said further understanding of the collective strengths and vulnerabilities of the U.S. power grid in the face of climate change is essential. For example, lower reserve margins do not imply inevitable brownout or blackout events. The utilization of demand-response measures, gas turbines, renewable energy sources, and electricity imported from other regions may help ensure a steady supply of power that can meet demand.

Still, the integration of these solutions also poses operational challenges to the electricity grid, including natural gas pipeline congestion caused by competing electric and heating uses, and variable and decentralized electricity generation issues for renewables.

"We have to consider how we want our electricity infrastructure to operate as a system and beyond the typical lifespan of a single power plant in order to maintain the same level of reliability that we have today," Miara said. "We need to plan for the impacts of climate change and advances in electricity-generation technologies and grid management, and we need invest accordingly in the development and modernization of our power supply infrastructure to meet future demand."