Protein seen 'quaking' after chemical bond breaks
- Date:
- May 21, 2015
- Source:
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
- Summary:
- Scientists for the first time have precisely measured a protein's natural "knee-jerk" reaction to the breaking of a chemical bond -- a quaking motion that propagated through the protein at the speed of sound.
- Share:
Scientists for the first time have precisely measured a protein's natural "knee-jerk" reaction to the breaking of a chemical bond -- a quaking motion that propagated through the protein at the speed of sound.
The result, from an X-ray laser experiment at the Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, could provide clues to how more complex processes unfold as chemical bonds form and break.
"This work helps us to see how proteins work, in general," said Marco Cammarata, who led the experiment at SLAC's Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) X-ray laser, a DOE Office of Science User Facility. The research is detailed in the April 2 edition of Nature Communications.
The study focused on myoglobin, a protein that stores oxygen in muscle cells. It is considered a model protein that is sometimes referred to as the "hydrogen atom of biology." The unique LCLS pulses enabled researches to measure, for the first time at such an ultrafast timescale and under very natural conditions, how the entire protein shook in response to a light-triggered break in a molecular bond.
Proteins are a vital part of the body's microscopic machinery. Their movement and shape help determine their function, and studying them is key in designing new drugs to fight disease, for example, and in replicating natural systems to produce new fuel sources. Understanding the natural motion of proteins in response to such basic and essential biochemical reactions as bond breaks could provide insight about a range of biological processes.
Watching a 'Protein Quake'
Scientists had previously seen some evidence of a quaking motion in a bacterial protein jarred by much higher energies, and had also observed myoglobin motion at longer timescales.
In the LCLS experiment they triggered the quake by attaching carbon monoxide molecules to the myoglobin and then breaking this bond with a light pulse. They then hit the samples with LCLS X-rays, and varied the timing of the X-rays to view the triggered motion.
Within a fraction of a picosecond, or trillionth of a second, after the bond broke, a quake-like wave rolled across the entire protein, causing it to stretch out.
The rapid expansion, which researchers precisely measured from the scattering of ultrabright X-rays that hit the samples, was followed by a vigorous shaking, like rustling leaves on a jounced tree limb.
They found that this quake-like effect, which had its "epicenter" at an iron atom at the core of the protein, dies off after just a few picoseconds. Based on their X-ray observations of the expansion and oscillations, researchers are working on a 3-D model detailing the protein's motion.
New Clues to Protein Function
The way the protein responds to the shaking motion could provide clues to how myoglobin functions in the body.
"This could suggest how the protein opens up channels to let oxygen in and out," said Henrik Lemke, an LCLS staff scientist who participated in the experiment. A similar oxygen-release process occurs in photosynthesis.
Cammarata said follow-up experiments, using a combination of X-ray techniques, will help determine whether more complex proteins, including other metal-containing proteins, exhibit the same kind of response as myoglobin.
"We'll be able to see if this type of quaking is a feature common to other proteins, too," he said.
Story Source:
Materials provided by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
- Matteo Levantino, Giorgio Schirò, Henrik Till Lemke, Grazia Cottone, James Michael Glownia, Diling Zhu, Mathieu Chollet, Hyotcherl Ihee, Antonio Cupane, Marco Cammarata. Ultrafast myoglobin structural dynamics observed with an X-ray free-electron laser. Nature Communications, 2015; 6: 6772 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7772
Cite This Page: