New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Women face dishonesty more often than men during negotiations

Date:
October 2, 2014
Source:
Vanderbilt University
Summary:
Women in business negotiations face more deceit than men, according to new research. "We found that men and women alike were targeting women with more deception than men," said a co-author of the new research. "It was interesting that men and women alike tried to deceive women in negotiations."
Share:
FULL STORY

Women in business negotiations face more deceit than men, according to new research.

In a study to be published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, researchers found that women are usually at a disadvantage during negotiations.

"We found that men and women alike were targeting women with more deception than men," said Jessica Kennedy, assistant professor of management at the Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management and co-author of the new research. "It was interesting that men and women alike tried to deceive women in negotiations."

LOW EXPECTATIONS FOR WOMEN

Low expectations for a negotiator's competence drove deceptive intent. Perceptions of "warmth" -- or likability -- reduced deceptive intent, even though warm negotiators were perceived as easier to mislead.

In one of the studies, MBA students held mock real estate negotiations where it was left to the buyer whether to reveal that the "real" intention for the use of the land in question contradicted the seller's wishes. Buyers admitted to being deceitful to 22 percent of female sellers, compared to just 5 percent of male sellers.

Further investigation found that the deceptions were crimes of opportunity. Women at the negotiating table were perceived as easier to deceive than men, so therefore standards of propriety slipped as the fear of being caught dissipated.

"Two experiments were simple scenario studies where we put people in a hypothetical situation where they imagined they had something to sell," Kennedy said. "Then we manipulated only the name of the potential buyer. We measured a number of different things, and what kept popping up is people expected women to be easier to mislead than men."

Whether the gender stereotype of women being easier to mislead is accurate is an open question, Kennedy said

"Men and women alike are poor at detecting deception," she said. "Past work has established that women are better at decoding nonverbal cues than men, though no better at catching a liar."

UPSET THE STEREOTYPE

Kennedy said women can try to upset the stereotypes to combat this form of discrimination.

"Stereotypes are difficult to disconfirm, but I think we can train women to exhibit characteristics in negotiations that suggest they're not at all easy to mislead," she said. "If we have women persistently questioning information, asking for verification from multiple sources, writing critical things in contracts and signaling a willingness to retaliate for deception, I think that should help to disconfirm this stereotype."


Story Source:

Materials provided by Vanderbilt University. Original written by Jim Patterson. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Laura J. Kray, Jessica A. Kennedy, Alex B. Van Zant. Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2014; DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.06.002

Cite This Page:

Vanderbilt University. "Women face dishonesty more often than men during negotiations." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 2 October 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141002162655.htm>.
Vanderbilt University. (2014, October 2). Women face dishonesty more often than men during negotiations. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 22, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141002162655.htm
Vanderbilt University. "Women face dishonesty more often than men during negotiations." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141002162655.htm (accessed December 22, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES