For Plants, Size Doesn't Matter When It Comes To Metabolism

In a report published in the Jan. 26 issue of the journal Nature, biologist Peter Reich of the University of Minnesota and his colleagues found that the rate of plant metabolism, or respiration--and its related emissions of carbon dioxide--can be deduced from the nitrogen content of any plant.

Plants carry out respiration during the dark hours when they, like animals, take in oxygen and give off carbon dioxide. During daylight, plants carry out photosynthesis, in which the process is reversed.

Researchers have estimated that plant respiration releases five to 10 times as much carbon dioxide as fossil fuel burning. It's crucial, they say, to know the amount of plant emissions more accurately. Yet, "the amount of carbon dioxide given off by plants is one of the weak spots in models of global carbon cycling," Reich said.

Theory has held that the rate of metabolism in plants, also as in animals, is higher in smaller plants and lower in larger ones. So to calculate how much metabolic byproduct the plants were giving off, researchers had to adjust their numbers to account for the plants' size.

But when Reich studied 500 plants in 43 species, he found that a plant's weight and its respiration rate are directly related: the heavier the plant, the more it respired. The key to metabolism rate, he found, was the element nitrogen. The more nitrogen a plant contained, the more it respired, and the more carbon dioxide the plant emitted. And, plants containing the same amount of nitrogen respired the same, regardless of their sizes.

"In revealing nitrogen content as the key to plant metabolic rates, the work uncovered a fundamental difference between plants and animals," said Martyn Caldwell, program director in NSF's Division of Environmental Biology. "Linking plant metabolism to nitrogen can also assist efforts to measure the global carbon cycle."

"If all the carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuel burning were to stay in the atmosphere, its rate of accumulation in the atmosphere would be two-and-a-half times faster than it actually is, and climate would change two-and-a-half times faster," said Reich. "Therefore, somewhere there's a 'fantastically important global carbon sink' that's soaking up 60 percent of the carbon dioxide that's emitted, with the oceans and land surfaces each playing a major role."

Co-authors of the paper are Mark Tjoelker of Texas A&M University, Jose-Luis Machado of Swarthmore College and Jacek Oleksyn of the Polish Academy of Sciences. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the Wilderness Research Foundation.